Compare each Source with the version we chose to keep. The gallery also shows when the Source was already best—and when a result changed too much to deserve a place beside it.
For complete photographs with names, dates, sources, relationships, and unanswered questions, visit the Museum.
Three photographs. Three careful decisions.
A faithful result is not always the most dramatic one.
Sometimes restoration helps. Sometimes the Source is already the best version. Sometimes a result changes the person and should not be kept. Open each photograph to see why.
01Restored and keptThe repair helped without changing the family.Frank Tengle family, Hale County, Alabama+
Restored
Source
‹ ›
What we kept
We kept this restoration result beside the Source. The faces are easier to see while skin texture, porch wood, and the shape of the full scene remain believable.
Why
We compared the complete photograph and the face details with the Source. The repair reduced fading and made the family clearer without adding unsupported features.
What to know
The restored file is smaller than the Source, so it is useful for viewing rather than a higher-resolution archival replacement. The Source remains the record.
02Source keptThe Source was already the truest version.Floyd Burroughs, Hale County, Alabama+
SourceSource kept
What we kept
We kept the Source and show no before-and-after comparison. The returned image offered no meaningful improvement, so presenting it as a transformation would be misleading.
Why
We compared the whole photograph and its fine details. When the result did not make the portrait clearer or repair visible damage, the Source remained the better choice.
What to know
Leaving a sound photograph unchanged can be the most faithful outcome. A different file or a later repair may still produce a different result.
03Result not keptA cleaner face was not a truer face.Allie Mae Burroughs, Hale County, Alabama+
SourceResult not kept
What we kept
We did not keep the restored result. It added freckles and blemishes across the forehead and cheeks and simplified hair that the Source did not support.
Why
We compared the complete portrait and the face at close range. Although the result looked cleaner at first glance, the person's likeness had changed.
What to know
The rejected result is deliberately not shown as a transformation. Keeping it out of the gallery is part of preserving the person's identity.
Historical and family examples chosen to show careful repair, optional color, and specialist work.
Showing the faithful restoration result for each public example.
Faithful restore
Repair-first examples where the restoration result stays close to the accepted Source.
After
Before
‹ ›
Faithful restore
Civil War Ambrotype
A young soldier in a glass-plate portrait, faded by time and storage. Restoration brings back contrast and facial detail while preserving the Source for comparison; fine details remain an AI interpretation.
Archive context: accepted Source preserved, restoration chosen, names and caption ready for private sharing.
After
Before
‹ ›
Faithful restore
Grandfather & Grandchild
A grandfather and grandchild on the front steps. Fading is repaired and the original mood remains.
Archive context: accepted Source preserved, restoration chosen, names and caption ready for private sharing.
Optional color
Optional color shown beside a faithful repair, not as the only final result.
After
Before
‹ ›
Faithful restore
Mother & Child
A young mother and her baby in a creased, faded portrait. Repair clarifies the likeness while preserving the accepted Source beside the restoration result.
Archive context: accepted Source preserved, restoration chosen, names and caption ready for private sharing.
Specialist repair
Focused examples for blur, glare, grain, and face-detail issues.
After
Before
‹ ›
Specialist repair
Low-Light Grain Cleanup
An indoor scene shot in poor light, denoised to clear grain without smoothing away useful texture. Noise reduction runs only where no face is present.
Archive context: accepted Source preserved, restoration chosen, names and caption ready for private sharing.
After
Before
‹ ›
Specialist repair
Reading Through Window Glare
An old print scanned beside a bright window, the light washing across the room. The wash is pulled back so the children, the crib and the table read clearly. The window itself stays blown out — that detail was never captured, so it is not invented here.
Archive context: accepted Source preserved, restoration chosen, names and caption ready for private sharing.
Opt-in generative
Opt-in generative examples with clear disclosure.
Opt-in generativeOpt-in generative motion
Portrait Brought to Life
A restored family portrait with subtle generated motion. The archival still stays preserved, and the motion version remains a separate shareable reveal.
Archive context: accepted Source preserved, restoration chosen, names and caption ready for private sharing.
Animation: subtle AI-generated motion from a restored portrait.