Skip to main content

Three photographs. Three careful decisions.

A faithful result is not always the most dramatic one.

Sometimes restoration helps. Sometimes the Source is already the best version. Sometimes a result changes the person and should not be kept. Open each photograph to see why.

01Restored and keptThe repair helped without changing the family.Frank Tengle family, Hale County, Alabama
Reviewed restoration of the Frank Tengle family photograph with clearer faces and preserved wood and skin textureRestored
Original Walker Evans photograph of the Frank Tengle family in Hale County, AlabamaSource
What we kept

We kept this restoration result beside the Source. The faces are easier to see while skin texture, porch wood, and the shape of the full scene remain believable.

Why

We compared the complete photograph and the face details with the Source. The repair reduced fading and made the family clearer without adding unsupported features.

What to know

The restored file is smaller than the Source, so it is useful for viewing rather than a higher-resolution archival replacement. The Source remains the record.

02Source keptThe Source was already the truest version.Floyd Burroughs, Hale County, Alabama
Original Walker Evans portrait of Floyd Burroughs in Hale County, Alabama
SourceSource kept
What we kept

We kept the Source and show no before-and-after comparison. The returned image offered no meaningful improvement, so presenting it as a transformation would be misleading.

Why

We compared the whole photograph and its fine details. When the result did not make the portrait clearer or repair visible damage, the Source remained the better choice.

What to know

Leaving a sound photograph unchanged can be the most faithful outcome. A different file or a later repair may still produce a different result.

03Result not keptA cleaner face was not a truer face.Allie Mae Burroughs, Hale County, Alabama
Original Walker Evans portrait of Allie Mae Burroughs in Hale County, Alabama
SourceResult not kept
What we kept

We did not keep the restored result. It added freckles and blemishes across the forehead and cheeks and simplified hair that the Source did not support.

Why

We compared the complete portrait and the face at close range. Although the result looked cleaner at first glance, the person's likeness had changed.

What to know

The rejected result is deliberately not shown as a transformation. Keeping it out of the gallery is part of preserving the person's identity.

1 of 3 examples explored.

Restoration Gallery · Nostalgia